Emergency Banner

Policy Cancelation Notice Requirements May Not Be the Same for Insured and Insurer

In Spielberg v. Progressive Select Ins. Co., No. 4D19-3081 (Fla. 4th DCA Feb. 10, 2021), the Fourth DCA held that an auto insurer did not have to provide certain statutorily-prescribed policy cancellation notice requirements when the cancellation was requested by a named insured—as opposed to being initiated by the insurer itself.  Unbeknownst to Plaintiff, a named insured on the auto policy and who was involved in an auto accident four days after her son- also a named insured on the policy – requested the insurer cancel the policy.  Plaintiff argued that she did not receive proper notice of cancellation as required under Florida statutes. The Fourth DCA disagreed, explaining that although Plaintiff’s auto policy was of the type covered under the statutory provisions regarding cancellation notice requirements, the notice requirements had not been triggered since the request for cancellation was not one of the insurer-initiated reasons for cancellation laid out in the statutes. Accordingly, summary judgment in favor of Progressive was affirmed.

Share Now:

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Recent Posts

Congratulations to Our Newest Associates!
Please join us in congratulating the firm’s law clerks who officially joined our team! We applaud their outstanding achievements and welcome them as our...
KD Secures Appellate Victory in Settlement Payment Dispute
Angela Flowers of our Ocala office obtained an affirmance from the Sixth District Court of Appeal of an order denying plaintiff’s motion to enforce a settlement...
Webinar Debrief - Claims in the New Era: Florida’s Tort Reform Explained
If you missed our recent webinar on Florida’s Tort Reform (HB 837), here are some of the key legal developments and practical takeaways every claims professional...

Only PDF, JPG or GIF can be uploaded.

Search Results Will Show Here

Subscribe To Our Newsletter