Emergency Banner

Partial Resolution + Execution = Departure from the Essential Requirements of the Law

Sharon Degnan and Sebastian Mejia recently received a favorable ruling in Mohler v. Elliott, No. 2D21-2276 (Fla. 2d DCA Jan. 14, 2022). In Mohler, the Second District Court of Appeal granted a petition for writ of certiorari and quashed a partial final summary judgment, which awarded the plaintiff a portion of her medical bills before trial and permitted execution on the judgment.  In granting certiorari review, the appellate court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that the judgment was an appealable non-final partial judgment and concluded that all of the plaintiff’s damages remained in dispute, even those erroneously awarded in the partial final summary judgment.  Additionally, the appellate court concluded that it is a departure from the essential requirements of law for a trial court to enter an order resolving only part of a civil lawsuit by requiring a party to make an interim payment while leaving intertwined factual matters unresolved. Full opinion here.

Share Now:

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Recent Posts

Webinar Debrief - To Appeal or Not Appeal: What’s Appealable and When
Did you miss our recent webinar on appeals? Here are few takeaways: Determining whether—and when—an order can be appealed requires a careful and nuanced...
Connect with Caryn Bellus at the FDCC 2025 Insurance Industry Institute in New York
Caryn Bellus will be attending the FDCC 2025 Insurance Industry Institute, November 5–7 at The Westin New York at Times Square. This premier event brings...
Dismissal Secured in Products Liability Case for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction
Stephen Cozart and Cristina Federico, from our Pensacola office, obtained a dismissal in a products liability case based on lack of personal jurisdiction. The...

Only PDF, JPG or GIF can be uploaded.

Search Results Will Show Here

Subscribe To Our Newsletter