Emergency Banner

Final Summary Judgment in Construction Defect Case

Michelle Krone and Michael Valverde, of the Fort Myers office, prevailed on a Final Summary Judgment Motion in a construction defect case. The claim against our client was brought by a general contractor in a third-party complaint alleging common law indemnity and contribution. The case involved renovations to a single-family residence in Fort Myers and the construction of an addition that nearly tripled the size of the home. During the renovations and construction, a fire occurred that required remediation and reconstruction of most of the residence. Our client performed interior faux painting on the residence and fire remediation services related to the work after the fire. The general contractor who was sued, in an overzealous effort to cast blame elsewhere, brought a third-party claim against our client based on allegations that the company saturated the interior walls with water as part of its fire remediation services, allegedly contributing to the extensive mold that was already in the residence. Originally, the third-party complaint contained a single count of contribution.

While the homeowners themselves recognized the futility of an action against our client, the general contractor would not be dissuaded despite aggressive discovery and an early proposal for settlement. As expected, the general contractor rejected the proposal as well as several subsequent attempts at settlement for the same nominal amount. The same nominal offer was also made directly to the homeowners, who accepted the offer in exchange for a full scope-of-work release as to our client, and their work on the project. A motion for final summary judgment was then filed on the contribution count. The general contractor then filed an amended third-party complaint adding an additional count of common law indemnity. In response, Michele and Michael filed an amended motion for final summary judgment, and successfully argued that, regardless of the amendment to the third-party complaint, our defendant was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. The trial court agreed and granted the defense motion.

Share Now:

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Recent Posts

Congratulations to Our Newest Associates!
Please join us in congratulating the firm’s law clerks who officially joined our team! We applaud their outstanding achievements and welcome them as our...
KD Secures Appellate Victory in Settlement Payment Dispute
Angela Flowers of our Ocala office obtained an affirmance from the Sixth District Court of Appeal of an order denying plaintiff’s motion to enforce a settlement...
Webinar Debrief - Claims in the New Era: Florida’s Tort Reform Explained
If you missed our recent webinar on Florida’s Tort Reform (HB 837), here are some of the key legal developments and practical takeaways every claims professional...

Only PDF, JPG or GIF can be uploaded.

Search Results Will Show Here

Subscribe To Our Newsletter