Published Works

<< Return to Published Works List

The Statutory Advantage in Medical Malpractice Actions

August 12, 2016

Florida medical malpractice claims are often feared due the myriad of intricacies that impact the prosecution and defense of each claim.  This complex set of rules, once fully mastered, can be used as a sword and shield in the mêlée of medical malpractice litigation.  Malpractice actions tick at a faster pace than most claims as Florida Statute § 95.11(4)(b) mandates that all lawsuits based in medical negligence must commence within two years from the incident giving rise to the action or within two years from the time the incident is discovered, or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence.

Prior to the commencement of litigation, the prospective parties must complete a pre-suit investigation pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 766.203.  Pre-suit notices of intent must strictly comply with Fla. Stat. § 766.106.  Furthermore, the prospective claimant is required to notify each prospective defendant by certified mail, return receipt, of their intent to initiate litigation for medical negligence before any action may be filed.  See Fla. Stat. § 766.106(2)(a).  Proper statutory notices must include, if available, a list of all known health care providers seen by the claimant for the injuries complained of subsequent to the alleged act of negligence, all known health care providers during the two-year period prior to the alleged act of negligence who treated or evaluated the claimant, copies of all of the medical records relied upon by the Plaintiff’s expert who signed the required affidavit, and the executed authorization form provided in § 766.1065.  See Fla. Stat. § 766.106(2)(b).

A party’s failure to strictly comply with each and every requirement of § 766.106, presents grounds for a determination of inadequacy.  If the notice of intent fails to comport to the statute, then any complaint filed thereafter is arguably flawed, as filing a complaint prior to service of the notice of intent is grounds for dismissal of the action.  Bove v. Naples HMA, LLC, et al., 41 Fla. L. Weekly D827f (2016); see also Kukral v. D. Mekras, M.D., 679 So. 2d 278, 284-85 (Fla. 1996).  Of course, a flaw in the notice of intent is only fatal if it cannot be cured prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations.  Stein v. Feingold, 629, So. 2d 998, 999 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).  While the majority of motions to dismiss are not dispositive, filing such a motion can be extremely effective in proffering to the bench what will eventually be the basis of a Motion for Summary Judgment.  The strategic timing of these preliminary motions can be cost effective as it may result in the dismissal of the entire claim if the shorter statute of limitations has expired.

Due to the number of pre-suit requirements buried within the rules, compliance with the statute of limitations can often times be a bit trickier than expected.  While the notice of intent to initiate litigation must be served within the time parameters set forth in Fla. Stat. § 95.11, for 90 days after the notice is filed, the statute of limitations is tolled as to all potential defendants.  Pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.650(b)(1), this notice serves not only as notice to the party directly served but also to any other prospective defendant “who bears a legal relationship” to that party or medical practice.  Kukral, 679 So. 2d at 285 (holding that the employer was in a legal relationship with the physician and accordingly, notice to the physician operated as notice to the employer under rule 1.650).  In the context of an employee/employer relationship, or even that of an independent contractor or placement agency scenario, it is common for notice to be served on the physician only, especially in cases where placement agencies are used to originate the relationship between the hospital or medical practice and physician. 

It is the plaintiff’s obligation to investigate, determine, notify, and be aware of those with whom a potential defendant may have a legal relationship.  Keep in mind, this “up-the-chain” notice only applies to those who “bear a legal relationship” to their superior agency at the time of service of the notice.  Where a prospective defendant is no longer in a legal relationship with the party served, the notice to the original party does not operate as notice to the third-party defendant.  Goldfarb v. Urciuoli, 858 So. 2d 397, 398-399 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).  The key is the relationship at the time of the service of the notice of intent to initiate litigation, not a prior relationship at the time of the alleged malpractice.  Id.

A seemingly insignificant detail such as the return receipt on a notice of intent to sue or in cases of alleged liability under the doctrine of respondeat superior, the date upon which the physician and medical agency terminated their relationship after the date of alleged malpractice, can be the difference in obtaining a dismissal of a medical malpractice claim, to the tune of several million dollars in many circumstances.



Miami Office

25 West Flagler Street, Penthouse
Miami, FL 33130

T: 305.374.1212 F: 305.374.7846

view location | map location


Key West

Key West Office

402 Applerouth Lane, Suite 2C
Key West, FL 33040

T: 305.509.7300 F: 305.374.7846

view location | map location
Ft. Lauderdale

Ft. Lauderdale Office

One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 1600
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

T: 954.768.0011 F: 954.768.0514

view location | map location
West Palm Beach

West Palm Beach Office

515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 1800
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

T: 561.640.0303 F: 561.640.0524

view location | map location

Indian River | Martin | Okeechobee | Palm Beach | Saint Lucie


Tampa Office

400 North Ashley Drive, Suite 1200
Tampa, FL 33602

T: 813.204.9776 F: 813.204.9660

view location | map location
Hernando | Hillsborough | Manatee | Pasco | Pinellas | Polk | Sarasota

Orlando Office

201 South Orange Avenue, Suite 475
Orlando, FL 32801

T: 407.245.3630 F: 407.245.7685

view location | map location
Brevard | Highlands | Orange | Osceola | Seminole

Ocala Office

101 Southwest 3rd Street
Ocala, FL 34471

T: 352.622.4222 F: 352.622.9122

view location | map location
Alachua | Citrus | Dixie | Gilchrist | Lake | Levy | Marion | Putnam | Sumter | Volusia

Jacksonville Office

76 South Laura Street, Suite 1400
Jacksonville, FL 32202

T: 904.396.0062 F: 904.396.0380

view location | map location
Baker | Bradford | Clay | Columbia | Duval | Flagler | Hamilton | Lafayette | Madison | Nassau | Saint Johns

Pensacola Office

125 West Romana Street, Suite 550
Pensacola, FL 32502

T: 850.434.0003 F: 850.434.0223

view location | map location

Escambia | Holmes | Okaloosa | Santa Rosa | Walton


Tallahassee Office

1705 Metropolitan Boulevard, Suite 202
Tallahassee, FL 32308

T: 850.222.5188 F: 850.222.5108

view location | map location

Bay | Calhoun | Franklin | Gadsden | Gulf | Jackson | Jefferson | Leon | Liberty | Wakulla | Washington

Ft. Myers

Ft. Myers Office

13350 Metro Parkway, Suite 401
Fort Myers, FL 33966

T: 239.334.8403 F: 239.939.0700

view location | map location

Charlotte | Collier | DeSoto | Glades | Hardee | Hendry | Lee


Mobile Office

11 North Water Street, Suite 10290
Mobile, Alabama 36602

T: 251.308.3351 F: 251.308.3352

view location | map location

hover over location name to preview, or click it for full details

Our Firm


In 1963, Gene Kubicki founded the firm based on dedication to excellence. The same high standards have been maintained for over five decades -- years which have seen the firm’s ranks swell to over 100 attorneys.


Our team knows return clients are the life blood of any law firm and this is why we ensure client satisfaction by an exacting attention to service and quality.  Client service coupled with a spectacular work ethic, makes our team hard to beat.

find an attorney


In response to the growing needs of its clients, the firm began expanding in the early 1980's and today is a diverse full-service law firm providing trial, appellate, coverage, commercial and real estate transaction services.

browse our practice areas


Kubicki Draper enjoys a national reputation for expertise in the handling of complex, high stakes litigation matters, as well as, appellate, general commercial and real estate practice.

preview our results


With a dozen offices throughout the State of Florida and other key points in the southern parts of Georgia, Alabama and Mississipi, our firm is familiar to every venue statewide and will never get home-teamed.

find the location near you